000			01433naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8647
003			OSt
005			20190211154520.0
008			021126s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aOBERG, Perola _97847
245	1	0	_aDoes administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation?
260			_c2002
520	3		_aHow corporatist arrangements actually work has not been empirically demonstrated, despite the theoretical focus on interest intermediation. This article investigates whether corporatism affects trust and deliberation in state activities, using Swedish public administration as a case study. First, it is doubtful that corporatism directly promotes trust among citizens, but it very likely promotes trust within and between the represented organizations. Second, interest-group representation cannot be understood as a process of strict delivering of positions adopted in advance. Preferences are often transformed in discussions where other interests are involved. Furthermore, the case investigated here shows that the decision-making process within a corporatist arrangement resembles deliberation, rather than negociations between "contesting interests."
773	0	8	_tGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions _g15, 4, p. 455-476 _d, 2002 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021126 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20100414 _b1511^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8792 _d8792
041			_aeng