000 | 01684naa a2200217uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8755 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154539.0 | ||
008 | 021128s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMcCOLLUM, James K. _96909 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRomania : _ba case study in delayed privatization |
260 |
_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c2002 |
||
520 | 3 | _aRomania emerged from 45 years of communism with 12,000 enterprises in state hands. As the nation moved toward democracy and free market conditions, its new leaders created legislation to privatize at least half of the state owned enterprises. In the years 1990 to 1996, the actions to privatize state owned enterprises went slowly, even through outside organizations such as the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and European Union urged speed in privatization. Until November 1996, former communists who had high positions under Nicolae Ceasusescu led the government. After 1996, with a reform coalition running the country, privatization speeded up and made a difference in the county's economy. Privatization continues even though the government changed hands again in 2000. Romania's delayed privatization program has so far precluded the emergence of a new group of powerful owners who become so strong they can stymie the long-temr achievement of a fully reformed economy | |
590 | _aVolume 25 | ||
590 | _aNumbers 9-10 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aSCHOENING, Niles C. _918086 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tInternational Journal of Public Administration- IJPA _g25, 9-10, p. 1221-1234 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 2002 _xISSN 01900692 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021128 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20100723 _b1502^b _cDaiane |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8900 _d8900 |
||
041 | _aeng |