000			01973naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8826
003			OSt
005			20190211154543.0
008			021202s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aFOCHT, Will _93630
245	1	0	_aAssessment and management of policy conflict in the illinois river watershed in Oklahoma : _ban application of Q methodology
260			_aNew York : _bMarcel Dekker, _c2002
520	3		_aEnvironmental policy formulation is a difficult business under the best of circumstances. In many cases, policymaking is complicated by factual uncertainty about the likely outcomes of policy intervention and by persistent value conflicts over desired policy intervention and by persistent value conflicts over desired policy ends and goals. This is nowhere more true than in formulating policy to manage adverse impacts to a watershed caused by natural and human activities. In the case of the Illinois River watershed in eastern Oklahoma, controversy over whether and how economic activities in the watershed should be regulated has effectively stifled meaningful policy reforms for three decades. As part of a test of a novel watershed management policymaking protocol funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency, a Q methodological study of stakeholders' perspectives on impact concerns and impact management preferences was conducted to diagnose the conflicts that have pre-empted policy initiatives for so long. We found that the conflicts that exist are not bipolar, but orthogonal - opening the way to potential super-optimun solutions that can satisfy everyone. This study demnonstrates the power of Q methodology to assess conflict and thereby suggest strategies for its resolution
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration- IJPA _g25, 11, p. 1311-1349 _dNew York : Marcel Dekker, 2002 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021202 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20100519 _b1718^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c8971 _d8971
041			_aeng