000			02033naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8988
003			OSt
005			20190211154611.0
008			021205s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHOBBS, Brian _94843
245	1	0	_aDifferent alliance relationships for project and execution
260			_c2001
520	3		_aThe IMEC research programme (International Programme on the Management of Construction projects) performed an exentisve benchmarking study of some 60 large engineering project around the world during the period from 1995 to 1999. The purpose of the study was to identify best practice within different areas of management of such projects. While much of the focus of the study was on the front-end phase of the projects, some aspects of project design and execution were also addressed. This paper explores the findings of the IMEC study in this respect, with an emphasis on different models for alliance relationships in the design and execution phases. A model consisting of four different configurations of the dynamics of project development and execution has been identified. Two of these are based on a traditional arms`length relationships in the design and execution phases. These traditional relationships have been explored in numerous existing publications and are, therefore, not dealt with specifically in this paper. The two configurations displaying a relational approach in the design and execution phases, termed "partners in design and execution" and "relational developement and execution", are described in detail. Perhaps the most important finding from the study is that there is no one "best practice" or "best configuration"for managing projects - the best-suited approach is highly dependent on the project in question and its characteristics
700	1		_aANDERSEN, Bjorn _918298
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Project Management _g19, 8, p. 465-469 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021205 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060609 _b1722^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9132 _d9132
041			_aeng