000 | 01515naa a2200241uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9005 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154613.0 | ||
008 | 021205s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCHEYNE, Christine _92171 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEnhanced legitimacy for local authority decision making : _bchallenges, setbacks and innovation |
260 | _c2002 | ||
520 | 3 | _aTraditional forms of participation and consultation have been widely criticised as limited, but there is also resistance to expanding citizen involvement in decision making. This raises the question of how to achieve democratic legitimacy; New Zealand's government is encouraging innovative deliberative techniques, including citizens'juries, in local authority decision making. One very contentious experiment has dampened New Zealand's enthusiasm for citizens' juries. This article reviews that experience and makes some corparisons with Britain. It also reviews another initiative: a tribunal deciding whether to continue fluoridation of a municipal water supply. Finally, the article considers prospects for fostering more effective citizen engagement in community decisions in New Zealand | |
650 | 4 |
_aLocal Government _916302 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aCitizens Juries _918315 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aDeliberative Democracy _918316 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aPolitical Participation _918317 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCOMRIE, Margie _918318 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy & Politics _g30, 4, p. 469-482 _d, 2002 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021205 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20140429 _b1026^b _ckarina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9149 _d9149 |
||
041 | _aeng |