000 | 01643naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9036 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154616.0 | ||
008 | 021205s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aREILLY, Adrian _98844 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe EU white paper on governance : _bthe implications of misguided assesment for UK subnational |
260 | _c2001 | ||
520 | 3 | _aFor subnatinal authorities In Europe the emergence of governance structures at the European level represents an opportunity to further their involvement in the policy process. However, the structures and process by which this governance is to be delivered require a deeper understanding of diferent national systems of governance. The modernisation agenda in the UK is producing an overall model that clearly emulates the structures of a more formalised federal systems and a comparative analysis with Germany and Spain shows that this system does not necessarily match the depth of citizen participation or governmental cooperation and parnership foramation upon which the non-regional system in the UK was built. It is suggested that care needs to be taken that a regional form in UK governance is not followed simplsy for forms`s sake. For the European Union, the issue is one of ensuring participation and openness - which entails being aware of the consequences of pursuing a purely regional governance programe at the exepense of effective subregional actor mobilisation and participation | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tLocal Government Studies _g27, 4, p. 1-18 _d, 2001 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021205 _bCassio _cCassio |
||
998 |
_a20060523 _b1019^b _cQuiteria |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9180 _d9180 |
||
041 | _aeng |