000			01266naa a2200181uu 4500
001			9189
003			OSt
005			20190211154640.0
008			021211s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBARRIOS, Sharon A _9828
245	1	0	_aIs the immigration and naturalization service unreformable : _bpast experience and future prospects
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2002
520	3		_aAccording to Immigration and Naturalism Service (INS) critiques, the agency is failing badly at it central tasks. The most common diagnos tic of this failure concludes that the INS has been grantel an excess of discretionary authority. Thus, the way to alleviate the situation is to remove some of this authority possibly by eliminating the INS altogether and assigning its functions to other government agencies. This article argues that the diagnosis is mistaken: the proper response is not to decrease the discretionary authority of the INS, as many of its critics have suggested, but rather to increase its autonomy and power
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g34, 4, p. 370-388 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2002 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021211 _bLucima _cLucimara
998			_a20100720 _b1116^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9330 _d9330
041			_aeng