| 000 | 01105naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 9225 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20240412172003.0 | ||
| 008 | 021211s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_94818 _aHindess, Barry |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aDeficit by design |
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis paper focuses on the distinguishing concern of the discourse of democratic deficit: namely that appear to be some striking discripancies between democratic norms and institutional practice. I argue in this paper that the problem of democratic deficit is in fact the normal condition of the institutions of representative government. Indeed, early arguments in favour of representative government insist that it departs from and is superior to democracy itself. If representative government provides the predominant modern understanding of democracy, then democratic deficit is an integral part of its design | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g31, 1, p. 30-38 _d, 2002 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20021211 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
| 998 |
_a20060523 _b1633^b _cQuiteria |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9366 _d9366 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||