000 | 01836naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9521 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211154734.0 | ||
008 | 021223s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHILL, Jennifer _94805 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aDifferential effects of high-quality child care |
260 | _c2002 | ||
520 | 3 | _aIn policy research a frequent aim is to estimate treatment effects separately by subgroups. This endeavor becomes a methodological challenge when the subgroups are defined by post-treatment, rather than pre-treatment, variables, causal interpretations are no longer valid. The authors illustrate a new approach to this challenge within the context of the Infant Health and Development Program, a multisite randomized study that provided at-risk children with intensive, center-based child care. This strategy is used to examine the differential causal effects of acess to high quality child care for children who would otherwise have participated in one of three child care options: no non-maternal care, home-based non-maternal care, and center-based care. Results of this study indicate that children participanting in the first two types of care would have gained the most from high-quality center-based care and, moreover, would have more consistently retained the bulk of these positive benefits over time. These results may have implications for policy, these positive benefits over time. These results may have implications for policy, particularly with regard to the debate about the potential implications of providing universal child care | |
700 | 1 |
_aWALDFOGET, Jane _918807 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBROOKS-GUNN, Jeanne _918808 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Policy Analysis and Management _g21, 4, p. 601-627 _d, 2002 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20021223 _bLucima _cLucimara |
||
998 |
_a20150810 _b1652^b _cAndre |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9660 _d9660 |
||
041 | _aeng |