000			01843naa a2200229uu 4500
001			9570
003			OSt
005			20190211154742.0
008			021226s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMITCHELL, Daniel J.B _97296
245	1	0	_aIR Journal and conference literature form the 1960s to the 1990s : _b
260			_c2001
520	3		_aThe industrial relations (IR) literature has changed notably from the early 1960s until the late 1990s. Yet it has retained and externalist flavor - a sene that the key variables determining outcomes are often outside the control of firm-level actors. However, the kind of externalism found in the modern IR literature differs notably from that of the past. Externalism today is seen as labor market and personal variables - often in an econometric formulation - reather than grand social forces. Generally, the IR literature has moved toward sophisticated empiricism and toward a labor economics paradigm. To the extent that the older grand themes remain, they are more likely to be found in IR books rather than in academic journals. Human resource (HR) academics and practitioners can nonetheless benefit from the IR approach, even though the tyranny of tenure review has made journal articles in IR less readable. The IR literature emphasizes that labor - market forces, sometimes stemming from product and financial markets, matter to HR outcomes. And it regards conflict more as a source of information rather than just a couse of los productivity
650		4	_aIndustrial Relations _917913
650		4	_aHuman Resource Management _917804
650		4	_aLabor Economics _918860
650		4	_aResearch Methodology _918861
773	0	8	_tHuman Resource Management Review _g11, 4, p. 375-393 _d, 2001 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20021226 _bCassio _cCassio
998			_a20060526 _b1015^b _cQuiteria
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c9709 _d9709
041			_aeng