Policy deployment : (Record no. 33408)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02469naa a2200205uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 0052014554337 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211171843.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 100520s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | JOLAYEMI, Joel K. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 35008 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Policy deployment : |
| Remainder of title | a review and comparisons of two best practices models |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Oxfordshire : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Routledge, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | jul./ago. 2009 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | In this research, we present comprehensive reviews and comparisons of two organisations' (Xerox's and Hewlettt-Packard's) best practices policy deployment models. The reviews and comparisons of the two models are based on thorough reviews of all published works on the models and on their applications in their respective owner-organisations. The reviews and comparisons are done with respect to each model's planning and application processes, structure, and distinguishing features. The contributions of each of the two organisations to policy deployment are highlighted. The research also presents a brief review of literature on the activities of the two organisations in continuing to sustain, maintain, and improve their quality cultures. The research shows that there are similarities and differences in the two organisations' best practices policy deployment models with respect to their formulation processes, structures, features, and implementation processes. We find the two models to be very comprehensive, innovative, and effective. We also find their implementations to be thorough, well-organised, successful, and inspiring. The research also shows that the two organisations have achieved excellence and outstanding success with their models. Additionally, it shows that they have made tremendous and excellent contributions to best practices in policy deployment. Furthermore, we find that they have continued to hold and sustain their enviable quality cultures and superior performances since the developments and applications of their best practices policy deployment models between the early 1980s and mid-1990s. There is a lot that other organisations can learn from these two organisations and their best practices policy deployment models. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | Volume 20 |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | Numbers 7-8 |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | Total Quality Management & Business Excellence |
| Related parts | 20, 7-8, p. 877-902 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Oxfordshire : Routledge, jul./ago. 2009 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 14783363 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20100520 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1455^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Daiane |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20100531 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1322^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Carolina |
No items available.
