<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 7232

Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation : (Record no. 7232)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01654naa a2200181uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 7076
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211154213.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 020919s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name HIX, Simon
9 (RLIN) 4836
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation :
Remainder of title why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2002
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. It is a widely accepted that the 1990 Treaty of Amsterdam significantly increased the powers of the European Parliament (EP). The critical question, however, is why the European Union (EU) governments didi this. I argue, contrary to existing explanations, that these changes came about because the EP was a `constitutional agenda-setter'. The rules in the EU Treaty, as established at Maastricht, were incomplete contracts, and the EU governments had imperfect information about the precise operation of the Treaty. As a result, the EP was able to re-interpret these rules to its advantage and threaten not to co-operate with the governments unless they accepted the EP's interpretations. The article shows how this process of discretion, interpretation and acceptance worked in thetwo main areas of EP powwer: in the legislative process (in the refor of the co-decision procedure). The article concludes that `agenda-setting trough discretion in rule interpretatin' is a common story in the development of the powers of parliaments, both at the domestic and EU levels
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title British Journal of Political Science
Related parts 32, 2, p. 259-280
Place, publisher, and date of publication , 2002
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20020919
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Lucima
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Lucimara
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060511
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 0938^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha