<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Managing through measurement or meaning? Lessons from experience with New Zealand's public sector performance management systems
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Managing through measurement or meaning? Lessons from experience with New Zealand's public sector performance management systems

By: NORMAN, Richard.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: dec. 2002International Review of Administrative Sciences 68, 4, p. 619-628Abstract: Comprehensive adoption of system for managing for results as an alternative to procedure-based bureaurcracy has earned the New Zealand public sector a reputation as the `world's a most advanced performance system (Kettl, 2000:7) Research with a cross-section of users of this system, now nearly 15 years old, reveals a variety of responses. True Believers support a current focus on measurement and think that morew effort should be put into creating clearer, more observable measures that emphasise outcomes. Pragmatic Sceptics see reported measures as part of a new game of public management and at best a starting point for asking about the substance behind the form. Active Doubters believe that too much emphasis on measurement gets in the way of the `real work' of developing relationship-based work in a political environment. Issues of meaning are seen to be more important than measurement for the further development of the system
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

Comprehensive adoption of system for managing for results as an alternative to procedure-based bureaurcracy has earned the New Zealand public sector a reputation as the `world's a most advanced performance system (Kettl, 2000:7) Research with a cross-section of users of this system, now nearly 15 years old, reveals a variety of responses. True Believers support a current focus on measurement and think that morew effort should be put into creating clearer, more observable measures that emphasise outcomes. Pragmatic Sceptics see reported measures as part of a new game of public management and at best a starting point for asking about the substance behind the form. Active Doubters believe that too much emphasis on measurement gets in the way of the `real work' of developing relationship-based work in a political environment. Issues of meaning are seen to be more important than measurement for the further development of the system

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha