<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Managing incoherence :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Managing incoherence : the coordination and empowerment conundrum

By: Peters, B. Guy.
Contributor(s): Savoie, Donald J.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, may/june 1996Public administration review: PAR 56, 3, p. 281-290Abstract: Two dimensiones of administrative change in contemporany democracies are at war with one another. On the one hand, the "new public management" argues that organizations should decentralize and empower lower echelon employees. Further, government is urged to decentralizeAbstract: structurally and to create autonomous nad semiautonomous organizations to deliver public services. On the other hand, continuing fiscal pressures and the requirements of the global economy point to the need to coordinate better not only policies but also programs which increasingly cut across departmental or agency lines. The united states presents an extreme case of the need coordinate multiple and often incoherent programs. That need has to a great extent been exacerbated by reforms stemming from the national performance review (NPR). The research reported in this article examines the impact of the NPR on the behavior of central agencies in Washington - the office of management and budget, the office of personnel management, and the general services administration. We argue that despite the changes over the past year, the fundamental nature of central agencies has not been transformed, and they are still very in the business of imposing central policy and management controls.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Two dimensiones of administrative change in contemporany democracies are at war with one another. On the one hand, the "new public management" argues that organizations should decentralize and empower lower echelon employees. Further, government is urged to decentralize

structurally and to create autonomous nad semiautonomous organizations to deliver public services. On the other hand, continuing fiscal pressures and the requirements of the global economy point to the need to coordinate better not only policies but also programs which increasingly cut across departmental or agency lines. The united states presents an extreme case of the need coordinate multiple and often incoherent programs. That need has to a great extent been exacerbated by reforms stemming from the national performance review (NPR). The research reported in this article examines the impact of the NPR on the behavior of central agencies in Washington - the office of management and budget, the office of personnel management, and the general services administration. We argue that despite the changes over the past year, the fundamental nature of central agencies has not been transformed, and they are still very in the business of imposing central policy and management controls.

Public administration review PAR

May/June 1996 Volume 56 Number 3

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha