<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993

By: Kravchuk, Robert S.
Contributor(s): SCHACK, Ronald W.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, 1996Public administration review : PAR 56, 4, p. 348-358Abstract: What are challenges posed for public sector decision makers by the government performance and results act of 1993 (GPRA)? Ad what can be done to enhance the possibility of effective performance measurement The GPRA calls for a vigorous implemetation of performance measurement across federal agencies by 199. Measures will be employed for both strategic management (planning) and evaluation of results (scorekeeping). A more formal use of performance measurement will surely bring many benmal use of performance measurement will surely bring many benefits. As Robert S. Kravchuk and Ronald W. Schack point out, however, the development of performance measurement sustems will introduce new, and perhaps unforeseen, problems. Kravchuk and Schack argue that increasing reliance on formal measurement approaches, at the expense of "hnds-on" management and evaluation, will place senior officials more in a cybernetic mode of decisionmaking, tahn a rational-actor mode. Paradoxically, performance measures may mininform as much as they inform, if users are unaware of the subtle limitations of measurement systems. The authors argue that the rigors of general systems theory can contribute ten general design principles for effective performance measurement systems.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

What are challenges posed for public sector decision makers by the government performance and results act of 1993 (GPRA)? Ad what can be done to enhance the possibility of effective performance measurement The GPRA calls for a vigorous implemetation of performance measurement across federal agencies by 199. Measures will be employed for both strategic management (planning) and evaluation of results (scorekeeping). A more formal use of performance measurement will surely bring many benmal use of performance measurement will surely bring many benefits. As Robert S. Kravchuk and Ronald W. Schack point out, however, the development of performance measurement sustems will introduce new, and perhaps unforeseen, problems. Kravchuk and Schack argue that increasing reliance on formal measurement approaches, at the expense of "hnds-on" management and evaluation, will place senior officials more in a cybernetic mode of decisionmaking, tahn a rational-actor mode. Paradoxically, performance measures may mininform as much as they inform, if users are unaware of the subtle limitations of measurement systems. The authors argue that the rigors of general systems theory can contribute ten general design principles for effective performance measurement systems.

Public administration review PAR

July/August 1996 volume 56 numero 4

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha