Political control for China's state-owned enterprises : lessons from America's experience with hybrid organizations
By: KOPPELL, Jonathan G. S
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Malden : Wiley-Blackwell, April 2007Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20, 2, p. 255-278Abstract: China's reform of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is intended to liberate the companies from bureaucratic control that hinders their management. Discussions of SOE reform, however, downplay the policy consequences. Can SOEs be "free" to succeed economically while some political control is maintained? Surprisingly, American experience with hybrid organizationsgovernment-created companies that straddle the line between public and privateoffers some precedent for managing the balance between political control and enterprise independence. Three strategies are derived for China. First, welfare functions must be stripped from SOEs and replaced by policy objectives compatible with commercial purposes. Second, reducing financial dependence on SOEs will remove a barrier to rational control. Third, and most importantly, a robust regulatory framework for control must be developed as a substitute for the weakened administrative linkages. The emerging control infrastructure rooted in state asset commissions is likely to prove ineffective for its blurring of ownership, administration, and regulation.
China's reform of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is intended to liberate the companies from bureaucratic control that hinders their management. Discussions of SOE reform, however, downplay the policy consequences. Can SOEs be "free" to succeed economically while some political control is maintained? Surprisingly, American experience with hybrid organizationsgovernment-created companies that straddle the line between public and privateoffers some precedent for managing the balance between political control and enterprise independence. Three strategies are derived for China. First, welfare functions must be stripped from SOEs and replaced by policy objectives compatible with commercial purposes. Second, reducing financial dependence on SOEs will remove a barrier to rational control. Third, and most importantly, a robust regulatory framework for control must be developed as a substitute for the weakened administrative linkages. The emerging control infrastructure rooted in state asset commissions is likely to prove ineffective for its blurring of ownership, administration, and regulation.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.